Discussion:
Laci was wearing tan pants
(too old to reply)
Patty
2003-11-14 03:30:43 UTC
Permalink
Posted on Thu, Nov. 13, 2003
Detective: Scott Peterson returned to marina and eluded a tail
By Brian Anderson
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

MODESTO - Scott Peterson repeatedly trekked to the Berkeley Marina in the weeks following
his wife's disappearance, stopping only briefly at the shore before trying to ditch
tailing authorities, a detective said in court today.

Also today, the lawyer for the 27-year-old massage therapist Peterson had an affair with
before his wife vanished Christmas Eve is no longer expected to testify, she told
reporters.

The developments came on the ninth day of Peterson's preliminary hearing, a day that
provided some of the greatest details yet in the high-profile case.

In his final day on the witness stand, Modesto police Detective Al Brocchini testified
that Peterson visited the marina Jan. 5, Jan. 6 and Jan. 9.

He said Modesto police officers followed Peterson on Jan. 5 as he drove to the marina in a
silver Subaru. The man had come home earlier that morning in his wife Laci's Landrover,
changed his clothes and left for the 90-minute ride to the Bay, he said.

From the marina parking lot, Peterson stared at the waters and left a few minutes later,
Brocchini said.

A day later, Peterson drove a rented car the roughly 85-mile route again, Brocchini said.
He once again gazed out at the waters for several minutes and then left.

With police officers behind, he used "counter surveillance" tactics, Brocchini said. He
pulled to the side of the freeway, made mid-block U-turns and drove erratically,
successfully losing investigators, the detective testified.

On Jan. 9, it was more of the same, Brocchini said. Peterson loaded suitcases into a truck
and left for Berkeley. He circled the lot, and again stared at the water, Brocchini said.
Peterson left, driving four hours south to a reservoir near San Luis Obispo, stopping
overnight at a Bakersfield hotel.

In heated questioning, Los Angeles attorney Mark Geragos, who represents Peterson, said
his client went to the Bay on days when articles about a search of the waters appeared in
the Modesto Bee. Peterson also might have gone to the marina to track down city workers
who saw him put his boat in the water, Geragos said.

Geragos said Brocchini failed to ask questions that did not jibe with his theory that
Peterson killed his pregnant wife on Dec. 23 or Dec. 24 and dumped her in San Francisco
Bay.

"We tried to ask him a lot of things," Brocchini said. "Scott was lying to us."

To which Geragos replied: "He was lying to you because he wasn't giving you the answers
you wanted to hear."

Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains and those of their unborn
son surfaced on the shoreline at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered on Laci's remains and a
12-18-inch length of duct tape plastered to her groin area.

Owen described autopsy photos of the body and the Point Isabel site where it was
discovered. Laci's mother and friends left the courtroom just before Owen began discussing
the photos.

Peterson showed no emotion.

The man told authorities he was fishing the day his wife disappeared and launched his boat
at the Berkeley Marina. He has denied killing Laci and is being held without bail in the
Stanislaus County Jail in Modesto.

Peterson's lawyers continued to focus on what they said was a misdirected and bungled
police investigation.

Geragos accused law enforcement officials of mishandling evidence, including a hair found
in pliers pulled from Peterson's boat. Mitochondrial DNA experts have said it hair likely
came from Laci.

Geragos has asked Judge Al Girolami to bar the evidence from the preliminary hearing. The
science behind testing procedures is riddled with flaws, a defense expert has testified.

Girolami said he will hear final arguments Friday on whether to admit it. A decision is
expected by Monday.

News also surfaced Thursday that Frey, one of the case's most anticipated witnesses, will
not take the stand. Her lawyer, Gloria Allred of Los Angeles, said prosecutors simply
decided not to call the woman.

"Miss Frey has been a victim of Scott Peterson's deception," Allred said. "The defense
might have chosen to re-victimize her."

Frey met Peterson through a mutual friend, whom he had asked to set him up with someone,
Brocchini testified. The friend later discovered Peterson was married.

Peterson told her he informed some people he was married and others that he was not
married because he recently lost his wife, Brocchini said. Peterson begged the woman not
to tell Frey, saying he would rather do it himself.

Allred would not disclose what Frey's reaction to the news was.

Owen will return to the stand Friday.
Kris Baker
2003-11-14 03:56:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
THIS is a description I've been trying to imagine:
duct tape in the groin area.

Here's another version:
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/11/13/peterson.hearing/index.html
Also Thursday, Modesto Police Det. Philip Owen
testified that when Laci's body washed up from
the San Francisco Bay, she was clad in tan pants
that closed with a drawstring.

And another:
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/laci_peterson/7256716.htm
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also
were wrapped with duct tape around the groin
area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and
close friends out of the courtroom near tears.

Can anyone find the website that had the images of the
remains? I can't find it.

Kris
JLplsSS
2003-11-14 05:41:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning.
That's very bad news for Scott.

I'm SO tired of all his apologists explaining away Scott's MANY lies with
highly improbable solutions. How will they (and Chris Pixley) explain away
this one?


Donna
My opinions might have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
2003-11-14 05:49:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by JLplsSS
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning.
That's very bad news for Scott.
I'm SO tired of all his apologists explaining away Scott's MANY lies with
highly improbable solutions. How will they (and Chris Pixley) explain away
this one?
Donna
My opinions might have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
Kidnappers got her the night before and substituted a double to fool Scott.

No, really.

RstJ
tinydancer
2003-11-14 05:59:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by JLplsSS
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning.
That's very bad news for Scott.
I'm SO tired of all his apologists explaining away Scott's MANY lies with
highly improbable solutions. How will they (and Chris Pixley) explain away
this one?
Actually, I saw Pixley tonight on LKL, and he's still tryin to push that
'black pants in the salt water all those months bleached out to kaiki' line
he gave last week. What a jerk. ;)


td
Post by JLplsSS
Donna
My opinions might have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
peter dostal
2003-11-14 05:52:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/11/13/peterson.hearing/index.html
Also Thursday, Modesto Police Det. Philip Owen
testified that when Laci's body washed up from
the San Francisco Bay, she was clad in tan pants
that closed with a drawstring.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/laci_peterson/7256716.htm
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also
were wrapped with duct tape around the groin
area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and
close friends out of the courtroom near tears.
Can anyone find the website that had the images of the
remains? I can't find it.
Kris
Now it is believable she wore tan pants.
The website you are asking for was bogus, there ain't no pictures on the
web.
tinydancer
2003-11-14 06:01:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/11/13/peterson.hearing/index.html
Also Thursday, Modesto Police Det. Philip Owen
testified that when Laci's body washed up from
the San Francisco Bay, she was clad in tan pants
that closed with a drawstring.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/laci_peterson/
7256716.htm
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also
were wrapped with duct tape around the groin
area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and
close friends out of the courtroom near tears.
Can anyone find the website that had the images of the
remains? I can't find it.
Kris
Now it is believable she wore tan pants.
The website you are asking for was bogus, there ain't no pictures on the
web.
We all viewed the remains here shortly after they were discovered. Or at
least those of us who were up to seeing them.

Sorry Kris, I didn't save the site.

td
Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
2003-11-14 06:07:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/11/13/peterson.hearing/index.html
Also Thursday, Modesto Police Det. Philip Owen
testified that when Laci's body washed up from
the San Francisco Bay, she was clad in tan pants
that closed with a drawstring.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/laci_peterson/
7256716.htm
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also
were wrapped with duct tape around the groin
area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and
close friends out of the courtroom near tears.
Can anyone find the website that had the images of the
remains? I can't find it.
Kris
Now it is believable she wore tan pants.
The website you are asking for was bogus, there ain't no pictures on the
web.
We all viewed the remains here shortly after they were discovered. Or at
least those of us who were up to seeing them.
Sorry Kris, I didn't save the site.
td
http://www.voodooscott.com/mountaingal.htm

Interpretation's wrong, but the picture's there.


RstJ
tinydancer
2003-11-14 06:15:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Post by peter dostal
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/11/13/peterson.hearing/index.html
Also Thursday, Modesto Police Det. Philip Owen
testified that when Laci's body washed up from
the San Francisco Bay, she was clad in tan pants
that closed with a drawstring.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/laci_peterson/
Post by Kris Baker
7256716.htm
Post by peter dostal
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also
were wrapped with duct tape around the groin
area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and
close friends out of the courtroom near tears.
Can anyone find the website that had the images of the
remains? I can't find it.
Kris
Now it is believable she wore tan pants.
The website you are asking for was bogus, there ain't no pictures on the
web.
We all viewed the remains here shortly after they were discovered. Or at
least those of us who were up to seeing them.
Sorry Kris, I didn't save the site.
td
http://www.voodooscott.com/mountaingal.htm
Interpretation's wrong, but the picture's there.
RstJ
Thanks Robert, there was another site, wasn't there? I thought I remembered
pictures with the detectives bending over the body in some of the shots.

td
peter dostal
2003-11-14 06:19:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by tinydancer
Post by Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
Post by tinydancer
We all viewed the remains here shortly after they were discovered. Or
at
Post by Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
Post by tinydancer
least those of us who were up to seeing them.
Sorry Kris, I didn't save the site.
td
http://www.voodooscott.com/mountaingal.htm
Interpretation's wrong, but the picture's there.
RstJ
Thanks Robert, there was another site, wasn't there? I thought I remembered
pictures with the detectives bending over the body in some of the shots.
td
I remember stating some official that these pictures were/are bogus. A hoax.
Don't put your faith in it.
Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
2003-11-14 06:25:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by tinydancer
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Post by peter dostal
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/11/13/peterson.hearing/index.html
Also Thursday, Modesto Police Det. Philip Owen
testified that when Laci's body washed up from
the San Francisco Bay, she was clad in tan pants
that closed with a drawstring.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/laci_peterson/
Post by Kris Baker
7256716.htm
Post by peter dostal
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also
were wrapped with duct tape around the groin
area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and
close friends out of the courtroom near tears.
Can anyone find the website that had the images of the
remains? I can't find it.
Kris
Now it is believable she wore tan pants.
The website you are asking for was bogus, there ain't no pictures on
the
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
Post by peter dostal
web.
We all viewed the remains here shortly after they were discovered. Or
at
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Kris Baker
least those of us who were up to seeing them.
Sorry Kris, I didn't save the site.
td
http://www.voodooscott.com/mountaingal.htm
Interpretation's wrong, but the picture's there.
RstJ
Thanks Robert, there was another site, wasn't there? I thought I remembered
pictures with the detectives bending over the body in some of the shots.
td
Yeah, but the pictures are gone. http://www.crimescenes.net/remains.htm.
Nothing there now. It was just the same picture, tweaked to show the detective
and turned right side up to give a better idea of what part was what.

RstJ
tinydancer
2003-11-14 06:36:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kris Baker
Post by tinydancer
Post by Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
Post by Kris Baker
Post by peter dostal
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/11/13/peterson.hearing/index.html
Also Thursday, Modesto Police Det. Philip Owen
testified that when Laci's body washed up from
the San Francisco Bay, she was clad in tan pants
that closed with a drawstring.
http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/special_packages/laci_peterson/
Post by tinydancer
Post by Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
Post by Kris Baker
7256716.htm
Post by peter dostal
Post by Kris Baker
Testimony revealed that Laci's body, which washed
up along the eastern edge of the San Francisco Bay
last April, had remnants of tan maternity pants --
pants her sister has testified Laci was wearing the
night before Christmas Eve, not the black pair her
husband said she was wearing when he left the
house Christmas Eve morning. The remains also
were wrapped with duct tape around the groin
area -- testimony that sent Laci's mother and
close friends out of the courtroom near tears.
Can anyone find the website that had the images of the
remains? I can't find it.
Kris
Now it is believable she wore tan pants.
The website you are asking for was bogus, there ain't no pictures on
the
Post by Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
Post by Kris Baker
Post by peter dostal
web.
We all viewed the remains here shortly after they were discovered.
Or
Post by Kris Baker
Post by tinydancer
at
Post by Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
Post by Kris Baker
least those of us who were up to seeing them.
Sorry Kris, I didn't save the site.
td
http://www.voodooscott.com/mountaingal.htm
Interpretation's wrong, but the picture's there.
RstJ
Thanks Robert, there was another site, wasn't there? I thought I remembered
pictures with the detectives bending over the body in some of the shots.
td
Yeah, but the pictures are gone. http://www.crimescenes.net/remains.htm.
Nothing there now. It was just the same picture, tweaked to show the detective
and turned right side up to give a better idea of what part was what.
RstJ
Well damn. I do remember showing them to a gynie friend of mine and he
pointed out something we were all looking at wrong. He pointed out the
nipples I think and we were seeing them as something else altogether.

td

td
Bradley K. Sherman
2003-11-14 13:41:59 UTC
Permalink
The line of argument is that Scott didn't know what clothes
Laci was wearing when she was killed? And this is incriminating?

Pretty weak.

She could have changed clothes after Scott saw her or Scott
could simply have misremembered. If my life depended on
remembering what my wife wore to work yesterday, I'd be in
big trouble.

Now if Laci was wearing clothes that Scott couldn't have known
she was wearing and he knew she was wearing them, now that's
incriminating.

--bks
tinydancer
2003-11-14 16:03:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
The line of argument is that Scott didn't know what clothes
Laci was wearing when she was killed? And this is incriminating?
Pretty weak.
She could have changed clothes after Scott saw her or Scott
could simply have misremembered. If my life depended on
remembering what my wife wore to work yesterday, I'd be in
big trouble.
Now if Laci was wearing clothes that Scott couldn't have known
she was wearing and he knew she was wearing them, now that's
incriminating.
--bks
You appear to be taking each piece of evidence alone. No one piece of
evidence, on it's own, a case makes. But put each piece of evidence
together and form a link with them, and you have a trail of evidence.

td
njs
2003-11-14 21:43:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
The line of argument is that Scott didn't know what clothes
Laci was wearing when she was killed? And this is incriminating?
Pretty weak.
She could have changed clothes after Scott saw her or Scott
could simply have misremembered. If my life depended on
remembering what my wife wore to work yesterday, I'd be in
big trouble.
in Scott's case, it wasn't "yesterday", it was a few hours earlier.
Also, the fact that the outfit from the 23rd may have been COMPLETELY
MISSING from her wardrobe (when her sister was taken in her home by
the police) is a very telling clue. Especially when Laci turns up
dead, wearing them.
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
Now if Laci was wearing clothes that Scott couldn't have known
she was wearing and he knew she was wearing them, now that's
incriminating.
--bks
you're looking at this the wrong way, darling. Her outfit from the day
before was gone. She turns up dead in it. Do the math. There are
reasons he was under suspicion, and I think that's been a big one,
right there,
Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
2003-11-14 21:53:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by njs
Post by Bradley K. Sherman
The line of argument is that Scott didn't know what clothes
Laci was wearing when she was killed? And this is incriminating?
Pretty weak.
She could have changed clothes after Scott saw her or Scott
could simply have misremembered. If my life depended on
remembering what my wife wore to work yesterday, I'd be in
big trouble.
in Scott's case, it wasn't "yesterday", it was a few hours earlier.
Also, the fact that the outfit from the 23rd may have been COMPLETELY
MISSING from her wardrobe (when her sister was taken in her home by
the police) is a very telling clue. Especially when Laci turns up
dead, wearing them.
Another Scotty botch. He probably never stopped to consider LE might
want to look at what she was wearing the day before. After all, she wasn't
supposed to be found and Scott certainly wasn't supposed to be suspected,
right? I mean, he was golf^^^fishing when she disappeared.

<...>

RstJ
peter dostal
2003-11-14 22:14:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by njs
you're looking at this the wrong way, darling. Her outfit from the day
before was gone. She turns up dead in it. Do the math. There are
reasons he was under suspicion, and I think that's been a big one,
right there,
What we have learned from the testimonies so far was that Laci was
wearing black pants at home and tan pants for an out-of-home date on Dec
23rd. Sounds like the black pants were the comfortable home dressing.
I am not sure that wearing pants for a couple of hours is a must for
laundry. It ain't for me - but of course I am not from California. And
if it was a must for Laci - how about the black pants again on the 24th?
Maybe it was her habit changing the pants (and top?) for something like
a haircut or buying a late present downtown?
Kris Baker
2003-11-14 16:40:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by tinydancer
Post by Robert St. James (el corazon del demonio)
http://www.voodooscott.com/mountaingal.htm
Interpretation's wrong, but the picture's there.
RstJ
Thanks, RstJ.
Post by tinydancer
Thanks Robert, there was another site, wasn't there?
I thought I remembered pictures with the detectives
bending over the body in some of the shots.
td
The more I see that picture, the less it makes
sense at all. I was just curious to see if
there were any visible duct tape or remnants
of clothing.

What I see, appears to be a large jellyfish.
Which is what Laci's body *may* have
resembled...but apparently it looked enough
like a body, that the discoverers recognized
it immediately.

Kris
Mjkenoyer
2003-11-15 03:59:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
<snip>

This is what troubles me greatly about this case. Any reason why the
duct tape was fastened to her groin in particular? Was it to help
attach the weights to her body? I hate to be gruesome but do you think
it was also to prevent a coffin birth? :-( :-(
Mike Walton
2003-11-15 21:42:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mjkenoyer
Post by Kris Baker
Post by Patty
Peterson was arrested April 18, days after his wife's remains
and those of their unborn son surfaced on the shoreline
at Richmond. Modesto police detective Philip Owen testified
Thursday that a pair of tan maternity pants were discovered
on Laci's remains and a 12-18-inch length of duct tape
plastered to her groin area.
duct tape in the groin area.
<snip>
This is what troubles me greatly about this case. Any reason why the
duct tape was fastened to her groin in particular? Was it to help
attach the weights to her body? I hate to be gruesome but do you think
it was also to prevent a coffin birth? :-( :-(
That's not gruesome. That's STUPID !

http://evil.shorturl.com
HudsonGrl
2003-11-16 00:34:41 UTC
Permalink
Subject: Re: Laci was wearing tan pants
Date: 11/14/2003 9:59 PM Central Standard Time
This is what troubles me greatly about this case. Any reason why the
duct tape was fastened to her groin in particular? Was it to help
attach the weights to her body? I hate to be gruesome but do you think
it was also to prevent a coffin birth? :-( :-(
i think it was precisely to try and prevent the birth. but, to think tape would
prevent the baby from eventually emerging....moronic.

Hudson
Mjkenoyer
2003-11-16 15:13:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by HudsonGrl
Subject: Re: Laci was wearing tan pants
Date: 11/14/2003 9:59 PM Central Standard Time
This is what troubles me greatly about this case. Any reason why the
duct tape was fastened to her groin in particular? Was it to help
attach the weights to her body? I hate to be gruesome but do you think
it was also to prevent a coffin birth? :-( :-(
i think it was precisely to try and prevent the birth. but, to think tape would
prevent the baby from eventually emerging....moronic.
Hudson
Well then again, it's Scott we're talking about...

m

Child
2003-11-14 06:54:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patty
He said Modesto police officers followed Peterson on Jan. 5 as he drove to the marina in a
silver Subaru. The man had come home earlier that morning in his wife Laci's Landrover,
changed his clothes and left for the 90-minute ride to the Bay, he said.
From the marina parking lot, Peterson stared at the waters and left a few minutes later,
Brocchini said.
A day later, Peterson drove a rented car the roughly 85-mile route again, Brocchini said.
He once again gazed out at the waters for several minutes and then left.
With police officers behind, he used "counter surveillance" tactics, Brocchini said. He
pulled to the side of the freeway, made mid-block U-turns and drove erratically,
successfully losing investigators, the detective testified.
On Jan. 9, it was more of the same, Brocchini said. Peterson loaded suitcases into a truck
and left for Berkeley. He circled the lot, and again stared at the water, Brocchini said.
Peterson left, driving four hours south to a reservoir near San Luis Obispo, stopping
overnight at a Bakersfield hotel.
this behavior is incredibly suspicious. What an idiot.
Patty
2003-11-14 08:55:03 UTC
Permalink
: Posted on Thu, Nov. 13, 2003
: Detective: Scott Peterson returned to marina and eluded a tail
: By Brian Anderson
: CONTRA COSTA TIMES
:
:
: On Jan. 9, it was more of the same, Brocchini said. Peterson loaded suitcases into a
truck
: and left for Berkeley. He circled the lot, and again stared at the water, Brocchini
said.
: Peterson left, driving four hours south to a reservoir near San Luis Obispo, stopping
: overnight at a Bakersfield hotel.
:
This reporter must be from out-of-state, it wasn't a reservoir near SLO. It was the
San Luis Reservoir, not too far off Highway 5, near Los Banos & Santa Nella in
Merced County. To go from Berkeley to SLO to Bakersfield would really be a
loop.

Q. How about on the 9th, where else did he go?
10 A. He went to the Berkeley Marina, he went to the
11 San Luis Forebay --
12 Q. Wait. What's there? What's that?
13 A. The San Luis Forebay.
14 Q. Okay. What is that?
15 A. San Luis Reservoir, down south a little ways.
16 Q. Okay. That reservoir just happened to be being
17 searched that day?
18 A. I don't recall.
19 Q. Well, that certainly would be something you might
20 want to know as an investigator in this case to find out why
21 he's going down there, wouldn't you?
22 A. No.
23 Q. So as an investigator, you don't want to know why
24 it is he went to the Bay, you don't want to know if there
25 was an article that was dated that morning in the Modesto
26 Bee that might have triggered him going to the Bay, you
27 don't want to know if he goes down to the San Luis -- where
28 was it? The San Luis Forebay?

1185
1 A. Right.
2 Q. -- yeah, to see if there was a search going on that
3 day there? You'd rather just come to the conclusion that
4 it's suspicious because he's returning to the scene, is that
5 it?
6 MR. DISTASO: Objection. It's argumentative and
7 compound.
8 THE COURT: Sustained.
Loading...